🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, intimidating messages recurred. Originally, supposedly from a retired cop and an ex-military commander, and then from the authorities. Finally, one resident claims he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: remain silent or experience severe repercussions.

Shaikh is one of many resisting a high-value project where this historic settlement – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be razed and redeveloped by a large business group.

"The distinctive community of the slum is like nowhere else in the globe," states the protester. "But their intention is to dismantle our community and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of this community sit in stark contrast to the high-rise structures and luxury apartments that overshadow the area. Dwellings are built haphazardly and often without proper sanitation, unregulated industries emit toxic smoke and the environment is filled with the suffocating smell of exposed drainage.

To some, the prospect of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of luxury high-rises, neat parks, contemporary malls and homes with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream achieved.

"There's no proper healthcare, proper streets or sewage systems and we have no places for kids to enjoy," explains a tea vendor, 56, who moved from southern India in that period. "The single option is to clear the area and build us new homes."

Resident Opposition

Yet certain residents, like Shaikh, are opposing the plan.

None deny that this community, long neglected as informal housing, is in stark need investment and development. But they are concerned that this project – without resident participation – might transform premium city property into an elite enclave, displacing the disadvantaged, migrant communities who have been there since the late 1800s.

These were these shunned, displaced people who built up the vacant wetlands into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and economic productivity, whose output is estimated at between a significant amount and a substantial sum annually, making it a major unregulated sectors.

Resettlement Issues

Out of about one million people living in the packed 2.2 square kilometer area, fewer than half will be able for replacement housing in the development, which is estimated to take an extended timeframe to finish. Others will be transferred to wastelands and saline fields on the remote edges of the metropolis, risking divide a historic community. A portion will not get housing at all.

People eligible to stay in the neighborhood will be allocated apartments in tower blocks, a substantial change from the evolved, communal way of residing and operating that has sustained Dharavi for generations.

Commercial activities from garment work to pottery and waste processing are projected to shrink in number and be relocated to a designated "commercial zone" far from people's residences.

Survival Challenge

For those such as the leather artisan, a workshop owner and multi-generational resident to reside in the slum, the plan presents a survival challenge. His rickety, three-floor operation produces leather coats – tailored coats, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – marketed in luxury boutiques in south Mumbai and internationally.

His family lives in the spaces underneath and laborers and sewers – workers from different regions – live there, enabling him to manage costs. Away from Dharavi's enclave, accommodation prices are often tenfold as high for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the official facilities close by, a conceptual model of the redevelopment plan illustrates a contrasting vision for the future. Slickly dressed residents mill about on bicycles and e-vehicles, purchasing international baguettes and breakfast items and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area near a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. This represents a complete departure from the inexpensive idli sambar breakfast and low-cost tea that supports local residents.

"This isn't progress for our community," says Shaikh. "This constitutes a huge land development that will price people out for our community to continue."

Additionally, there exists skepticism of the development company. Managed by an influential industrialist – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the Indian prime minister – the corporation has been subject to claims of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it rejects.

While administrative bodies labels it a collaborative effort, the corporation invested a significant amount for its 80% stake. A lawsuit alleging that the project was questionably assigned to the developer is under review in India's supreme court.

Continued Intimidation

After they started to publicly resist the project, protesters and community members assert they have been faced ongoing efforts of coercion and warning – involving communications, direct threats and suggestions that criticizing the project was comparable with anti-national sentiment – by individuals they allege are associated with the corporate group.

Part of the group alleged to have issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c